ReferenceTools
analyze_case
AI-powered case analysis with IRAC format
analyze_case
ProGenerate a structured analysis of a court opinion using AI. Returns facts, issue, holding, reasoning, and significance in IRAC format.
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
cluster_id | number | Yes | The cluster_id of the case to analyze |
include_principles | boolean | No | Also extract key legal principles (default: false) |
Example Request
{
"cluster_id": 2683546,
"include_principles": true
}Example Response
{
"case_name": "Brown v. Board of Education",
"citation": "347 U.S. 483 (1954)",
"analysis": {
"facts": "African American children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation...",
"issue": "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprive minority children of equal educational opportunities?",
"holding": "Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal and violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.",
"reasoning": "The Court found that segregation generates a feeling of inferiority that affects children's motivation to learn. Modern psychological knowledge demonstrates the detrimental effects of segregation...",
"significance": "Overruled Plessy v. Ferguson's \"separate but equal\" doctrine and established that racial segregation in public education is unconstitutional."
},
"legal_principles": [
"Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal",
"The Equal Protection Clause prohibits state-mandated racial segregation in schools",
"Psychological harm from segregation is legally cognizable"
]
}IRAC Format
The analysis follows the standard legal analysis framework:
- Issue - The legal question presented
- Rule - The applicable legal standard
- Analysis - How the rule applies to the facts
- Conclusion - The court's holding
See Also
- get_document - Get full case text
- Build a Case Brief